![]() Now we see IPO's come out at $30 and zoom up to $320 the same day... |
Well, well, well. How have all you little chickadees been, since we last visited on November 12? Ask me how I've been. Not very damn well, thank you, thanks to this insane stock market. In truth, I've made a few bucks, but this market is so worrisome. You know I have been in the
market for 50 years (Count 'em - 50 big fat years), and I have never even remotely seen such
madness as we see today. If I wanted to be in a more reasoned, conservative atmosphere, I
would go to Las Vegas. The guys betting the $100 chips would be much more studious and
careful, and would have a more business-like air about them.
Then you come to the stock market. Since our last article, we saw crazy Chinese stocks go from
50 cents to $12 in one day, then to $80 the second day, only to mercifully return to earth on the
third day. Now we see IPO's come out at $30 and zoom up to $320 the same day, and then close
around $270. That was today. My numbers may be off a little bit because I can't stand to get too
many particulars, but the point's the same. It's MADNESS.
I follow an interesting technology stock called Sycamore Networks (SCMR). They went public
October 22, 1999, at $38 per share. The same day the stock hit $270 7/8, before closing at $184 3/4.
The following week it traded at a low of $170, and in mid-November it reached $281 1/2.
I have been toying with the thought of grabbing this tiger by the tail, and maybe buying a few
shares. Their technology enables the transmission of data solely on wavelengths of light, which
is an advantage over current technology that requires optical signals traveling across fibers to be
converted into electrical signals. The science is real, as validated by Williams Communications
Group (WCG) agreeing on November 22 to buy $100 million of Sycamore products per year for
four years.
The two men that started Sycamore are for real too, as they started Cascade Communications
which routinely beat Cisco for business, before they sold Cascade to Ascend Communications
for $3.7 billion in 1997. The problem with buying stock in Sycamore is that they're not expected
to make a profit before 2001 at the earliest. So how do you value a stock like this? Let's look at
today. It opened up from yesterday's close of $253 1/2, at $264 ½ up $11. Now that's an
acceptable overnight profit, right? I'd love to do it every time. A few minutes later it went to
$267, and then went into reverse gear, going to $226 ½ shortly after 9:00 A.M., PST. A little
before 11:00 A.M. it was at $240 7/8. It closed at $242, down $11 1/2.
Now I don't think the mutual fund portfolio managers are doing most of this pushing and
shoving. I think it's the Phi Beta Kappa's of the day-trading world, that are following price
momentum in either direction, of course. With this modest write-up here, you probably know
more than one-half the day-traders out there. The main thrust of this article is not to sell you on
the virtues of Sycamore Networks, even though I do believe it has considerable promise.
I am writing this to warn you of a potential stock market disaster. I firmly believe it is coming,
but of course, the timing can never be known. But I can tell you that after one-half century in the
arena, this stock market is sick. Yesterday I heard that at least one analyst is recommending
Cisco to go to even higher prices, with the valuation based on 2001 earnings. Don't get me
wrong. Cisco is one of the great technology stocks of this or any other time. It just costs too
darned much. And when analysts justify their projections based on results two years out, you
better run, not walk to the nearest exit. I recall this methodology in past times of bloated P.E.'s,
and you can be sure that many trusting little shareholders subsequently inhaled vast quantities of
stock market gas.
When I get going, I love to overdo a good slamming. When do you recall seeing maybe five or
ten stocks being up 10, 20, or 30 points? Or how about 230 points? I'll answer for you, in case
your brain is a little numb from looking at these big numbers. NEVER! Got that? NEVER!
This is fun. I must repeat that. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER! If Graham and Dodd, the fathers of
modern investment analysis were to give a one sentence summary of these goings-on, they would
say this is not investment, it is MANIA!
Well, what should we do if I'm right? That sure would be easier to answer if we knew when the greater fool party would be over. Since we mortals can't even look one second into the future, I would recommend you consider the following:
We'll be writing again soon about dealing with your recommended 50% in U.S. stocks. If
nothing else, I hope this article reminds you that no stock market party goes on forever, and that
there are ominous signs all around us. I gave you a few anecdotes to think about, without going
into the narrow breadth of the advance, advance-decline ratios and new lows vs. new highs
statistics. They are all bad. Unless you're a Bear, in which case they're great.
I won't say cash is king yet, because there will be plenty of tax-loss selling this month, which has
already begun. This means opportunity to you. But looking into the future, we should get a big
dose of investment money through the first half of next month. Then BEWARE THE IDES OF
JANUARY! Stay tuned.
The Market Pro - December 9. 1999
Baywalk.com and its contributors do not recommend any securities or other investments. The articles and opinions in this publication are provided as general information only. Information provided is obtained from sources deemed reliable, but Baywalk.com and its contributors do not guarantee its accuracy or completeness or make any warranties with regard to the results to be obtained from its use. Terms of Use For Baywalk - Use of Baywalk signifies your agreement to the terms of use. |